Posts Tagged ‘cannes’

Cannes, Cannes. A comment by Jeff Goodby,

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Just read this nice comment on awards by Jeff Goodby. Here’s the article in full, copied from AdAge.

Jeff Goodby: ‘We are Becoming Irrelevant Award-Chasers’

Creative Leader Calls for Focus on the ‘Famousness’ of a Piece of Work

(AdAge.com) — I call it the “cab test.”

When you get into a taxi and tell the driver that you’re in advertising, they often ask you whether you’ve done anything they might be familiar with.

Well, have you?

Ironically, the more awards you’ve been winning these days, the more likely the answer is “No.”

It’s fast becoming clear that the majority of things we’re rewarding, as an industry, are either small or marginal efforts for legitimate clients, things we made for real clients that the clients seem not to have ever heard of, or out-and-out fakes.

Some of these projects are well-intentioned since, at the very least, they are meant to “inspire” us when we work on bigger, better-paying accounts. But without getting into whether this kind of activity is immoral or just plain chickenshit, I’d like to point out a graver toll it’s taking on us all: It’s making our business less famous. Less fun. Less public. Less about any of the reasons you probably got into it in the first place.

We’ve created a system that rewards work that is increasingly unknown to anyone outside the business. We have become connoisseurs of esoterica. And in the process, we’re becoming more about us, and less about changing the world.

We are becoming irrelevant award-chasers.

Sure, some of the best things we make nowadays are internet experiences with necessarily specific, limited audiences — that cab driver might not be expected to see them. But for the ones I’m talking about, the only intended audience is, well, us.

Ghost ads are symptom of the malaise
There are big, obvious signs of this syndrome everywhere, of course. The controversy in Dubai this year led to the rescinding of a big bag of awards and an Agency of the Year accolade (it also queered Creativity’s Top Ten and no doubt a host of other such end of the year tallies). There was the apparently fake J.C. Penney commercial that won at Cannes last year. The list goes on.

But beyond the nakedly exposed fakes lies a gray area of questionable stuff that is perhaps even more dangerous. At the Andy Awards this year, we gave a gold to a lovely magazine spread campaign for an FM radio station — but you had to wonder how such a station had the money to produce and run over 14 versions of such lush creations. And I have heard three different people from New York City — parents who are in our business — say they never got even a whiff of that widely-awarded school cell phone campaign.

As I say, this is not yet another complaint about ghost ads. It’s a protest against the people who compliment things for being “well-entered.” It’s a warning that we are, in effect, making things that serve our own agency brands instead of serving our clients and making a difference in the minds of the world.

Making marketing famous again
I want us all to be famous again, outside the walls of our agencies. How can we accomplish this?

Well, I think we have to demand that awards judges take into account the sheer “famousness” of a piece of work when they make their determinations.

Not whether the stuff worked — we are all quite good at making entry videos that make that case. (Judges parody these now as they watch them.) Not whether the stuff is new or ingenious — yeah, we all want that. I’m talking about naked fame. Whether it’s something you’ve ever heard of.

I don’t think that it’s wrong to have international judges — people who are probably among the most media- and internet-savvy types on the planet — mark things down a bit if they’ve never heard of them. For the good of our business. For the good of us all.

Bob Garfield recently complained that Cannes had become irrelevant because advertising forms had descended into “chaos.” Giving free rein to the fame factor helps make such quibbling irrelevant. No one feels uncomfortable celebrating “Whopper Sacrifice” or “Mac vs. PC” or Coke’s “Happiness Factory.”

Think about it the next time you get in a cab. Think about it when you consider what will make you want to get up and go to work tomorrow.

Do it for the fun we’ll all have

Cannes, Wrangler wins Grand Prix in Press

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Fred & Farid wins Grand Prix in Press for their Wrangler Campaign, “We are animals”.

http://www.dagensmedia.se/nyheter/byraer/article58897.ece

A PDF with all the winners:

http://www.dagensmedia.se/incoming/article58901.ece/BINARY/Press+Lions+Winners.pdf

See more executions on the Fred & Farid website.

Credits:

Advertising Agency: FFL Paris, France
Executive Creative Directors: Fred & Farid
Art Director / Copywriters: Julie Louison, Perinne Durand:
Agency Supervisors: Fred & Farid, Daniel Dormeyer, Brani Branitcheva, Vassilios Basos, Paola Bersi
Advertiser Supervisor: Giorgio Presca, Mark Cuthbert, Gary Burnand, Carmen Claes
Art Buyers: Camille Guerrier, Charlotte Delobelle
Media Strategy and Buying: FFL Media, Pascal Crifo

Mkey,

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

I remember how much discussions there was about so called scam work in Cannes a few years back. I even remember ads being pulled due to scam. And now, it’s all scam work. Ok, it might have run. But the objective for the ads are nothing but winning awards. A boring person would rant about pushing products.

What happened to “solve problems”? Today creatives invent the problems with the solution. What came first, the idea or the client? What ever happened with good bread & butter work?

“Yes, y’all might remember a Cannes gold lion winner of 1999 from DM9 DDB, Sao Paulo for Parmalat Hot Chili Ketchup, it was claimed to be a scam ad and AdAge even tried to find the source of the media run. After repeated calls by Advertising Age to the agency asking when and where the ad ran, a representative said the ad ran in June 1999 in an unnamed magazine published by a company called Sisal. The deadline for Cannes entries is two months earlier, in April, implying the ad only ran after it was awarded. And Sisal, a call to the company revealed, publishes car magazines, an improbable media choice for a ketchup ad. So, the Pringles ad might be a Badlander, in that we’ve seen the idea before. But then again, maybe not since the other ad might not have been a real ad anyway. Still, if you want to depict “hot” what better way than a tongue sticking out?”

Source: http://commercial-archive.com/node/143061